|
|
|
篇目详细内容 |
|
【篇名】 |
Distribution patterns of tree species in an evergreen broadleaved forest in eastern China |
|
【刊名】 |
Frontiers in Biology(Formerly known as Frontiers of Biology in China) |
|
【刊名缩写】 |
Front. Biol. |
|
【ISSN】 |
1674-7984 |
|
【EISSN】 |
1674-7992 |
|
【DOI】 |
10.1007/s11515-009-0043-4 |
|
【出版社】 |
Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag |
|
【出版年】 |
2009 |
|
【卷期】 |
4
卷4期 |
|
【页码】 |
531-538
页,共
8
页 |
|
【作者】 |
Zhengrong LUO;
Bingyang DING;
Xiangcheng MI;
Jiuhua YU;
Yougui WU;
|
|
【关键词】 |
subtropical evergreen forest; spatial pattern; spatial association; K function; species coexistence |
【摘要】 |
|
Ecological assembly rules in evergreen broadleaved forest are far from clear understanding. Spatial dispersion of individuals in a species is central in ecological theory. We analyzed the spatial patterns as well as associations between adult and juvenile of each tree species in a 5-ha subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest plot in eastern China. Out of the 74 species occurring with more than 10 individuals, 88.4% of these species are aggregated. Most of them are aggregated from small to large scales. Spatial distributions of some species correspond with topography. Many bad dispersed species in the Baishanzu exhibit a highly aggregated distribution at small scales. These suggest that environmental heterogeneity and/or dispersal limitation may be the most important mechanisms that control the distribution patterns of these species. Our observations of the aggregations of abundant species basically support the hypothesis that dispersal limitation decreases as the number of reproductive limitation trees increases. The rest species are randomly distributed, with less than 10 individuals. For most common species, spatial aggregation is weaker in larger diameter classes, and the distance between adults is larger than that between juveniles and adults, suggesting that density-dependence works on loosing aggregation and excluding nonspecific juvenile to form adult trees. However, the density-dependent effect is not strong enough to eliminate all seedlings near adult trees and to result in a regular distribution of trees; thus the density dependence is usually masked by the refuge effect. |
|
