(请使用IE浏览器访问本系统)

  学科分类

  基础科学

  工程技术

  生命科学

  人文社会科学

  其他

篇目详细内容

【篇名】 INTERVENTION VS. CO-OPERATION: LEGITIMACY OF THE EBRD CONDITIONALITY
【刊名】 Frontiers of Law in China
【刊名缩写】 Front. Law China
【ISSN】 1673-3428
【EISSN】 1673-3541
【DOI】 10.3868/s050-001-012-0017-1
【出版社】 Higher Education Press and Thomson Reuters
【出版年】 2012
【卷期】 7 卷2期
【页码】 314-328 页,共 15 页
【作者】 Yin Liu;
【关键词】

【摘要】
The EBRD is a “political bank.” “Multiparty democracy, pluralism and market economies” are the conditions (termed as “conditionality”) to get financial resources. The EBRD conditionality is coercive and intrusive. In sense of its nature, it is political rather than economic. Since it is purposed to foster the transition of open market, it is legitimate. In essence, it is believed to be a form of good international co-operation rather than that of willful or arbitrary intervention.
版权所有 © CALIS管理中心 2008