|
|
|
篇目详细内容 |
|
【篇名】 |
FROM COPENHAGEN TO DURBAN: ON INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE NEGOTIATIONS |
|
【刊名】 |
Frontiers of Law in China |
|
【刊名缩写】 |
Front. Law China |
|
【ISSN】 |
1673-3428 |
|
【EISSN】 |
1673-3541 |
|
【DOI】 |
10.3868/s050-001-012-0032-0 |
|
【出版社】 |
Higher Education Press and Thomson Reuters |
|
【出版年】 |
2012 |
|
【卷期】 |
7
卷4期 |
|
【页码】 |
668-680
页,共
13
页 |
|
【作者】 |
Mingde Cao;
|
|
【关键词】 |
|
【摘要】 |
|
Copenhagen Climate Change Conference began with high expectation but ended in despair. It reached the so-called Copenhagen Accord with some dissenters. The Copenhagen Accord calls for deep cuts in global emissions, but it has not reached a binding goal of greenhouse gas emission reduction commitment and is not a legal effective agreement. EU played a limited role in Copenhagen Climate Change Conference, while the US and China were crucial to achieve the Copenhagen Accord. The subsequent Cancun negotiation reached the Cancun Agreements, but many substantial issues remained unsolved, such as the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol and other core issues. Durban Climate Summit successfully managed to include the main polluters of the globe, especially the US and the main emerging economies (including India and China), to commit their obligations for the first time to reduce greenhouse gas emission reduction under the international framework, and all the parties of the conference agreed that they would negotiate new mechanisms of greenhouse gas reduction which will be implemented by 2020 before 2015. Durban Climate Summit has also reached a package of agreements on climate change. Among them, an important one is about the Global Climate Fund. But some key issues including quantified GHGs emission reduction goals among countries have not been solved. |
|
